# The oldest bibliographies, from Callimachus to Gessner

**What was the first bibliography, and how did lists of sources turn into the modern reference list?** The oldest known bibliography is the Pinakes of Callimachus, a catalogue of Greek writers and their works made at Alexandria in the third century BCE and known only through later mentions. Jerome listed Christian authors in 392 or 393, Johannes Trithemius printed a catalogue of about 7,000 works in 1494, and Conrad Gessner's Bibliotheca universalis of 1545 added place, printer, date and format.

Published 2026-09-26 by EdCitation. https://edcitation.com/newsletter/the-oldest-bibliographies

The oldest bibliography anyone can name is one nobody has read. Callimachus drew up the *Pinakes* at Alexandria in the third century BCE, and it is known only from later writers who mention or quote it (Blair, 2017; Stephens, n.d.). The oldest bibliographies that survive whole are late antique and medieval lists of authors, then two printed books: Johannes Trithemius's catalogue of church writers of 1494 and Conrad Gessner's *Bibliotheca universalis* of 1545.

EdCitation publishes this history, taken from library catalogue records, digitised copies, peer-reviewed histories of the book and the style guides' own pages, read on 26 September 2026. Where the sources disagree or could not be read, we say so.

Each list recorded something a reference still records. The scholarship can be searched by claim in [Find sources](https://edcitation.com/), modern entries built in [Cite a source](https://edcitation.com/cite), and a finished list tested in [Verify references](https://edcitation.com/verify-references), the way a bibliographer checks an entry against the record.

## What was the first bibliography?

The first bibliography known by name is the *Pinakes* ("tables") of Callimachus of Cyrene, a poet and scholar born around 305 BCE (Stephens, n.d.). No copy survives.

### What the Pinakes recorded

The Suda, which the Suda On Line project describes as a 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia, gives its title in translation as tables "of men distinguished in every branch of learning, and their works", in 120 books (Suda On Line, 2002). Stephens (n.d.) describes a listing of earlier Greek literature by genre, with a life of each author and each work identified by its opening words or first lines.

Three elements were already there: the author, the work, and a way to tell one work from another. There was no date and no place, because each "book" was a handwritten roll.

### Why nothing of it survives

Blair (2017) argues that ancient reference tools fared badly when texts moved from papyrus rolls to parchment books, because early medieval scribes did not choose lists of books to copy. The *Pinakes* was still cited as a model for catalogues in the Byzantine and Arabic traditions, Blair adds, yet Gessner, nearly eighteen centuries on, seems not to have known it existed, and lists Callimachus only as a poet.

## How did early Christian and medieval writers list authors?

They wrote catalogues of "illustrious men": short lives of writers, each followed by a list of what the writer produced. Jerome set the pattern in 392 or 393 with *De viris illustribus*, 135 mainly Christian authors from the apostles to Jerome himself (Ward & Wieser, 2022). Jerome named Suetonius's lives of Roman writers as the model and Eusebius's *Church History* as the main help.

### Continuations, century by century

Others extended the list: Gennadius of Marseille later in the fifth century, Isidore of Seville between 615 and 618, Sigebert of Gembloux around 1111 in 172 chapters, and Honorius Augustodunensis, most briefly, in the 1130s (Byrne, 2021). Byrne (2021) calls the genre a canon of Christian writers.

What they recorded was the author and the titles, sometimes with a word on the writer's virtue or style. Where a copy could be found, and who had made it, was not their concern.

## What did Trithemius's catalogue of 1494 add?

Size, order and an index. Trithemius, abbot of Sponheim, printed *Liber de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis* at Basel with Johann Amerbach after 28 August 1494. Keio University's digitised copy records about 7,000 works by more than 950 authors, arranged by date from St Clement onwards, each with a short life, a list of works with the genre of each, and the opening words of a work where known. An alphabetical index of authors comes first. Keio calls it the first bibliography in Europe compiled "as a practical work of reference" (Keio University Libraries, n.d.). The MGH's library adds that Trithemius drew heavily on Sponheim's own library (Monumenta Germaniae Historica, n.d.).

The index was the step that mattered: a reader could go straight to an author. But the entries described works, not printed books: no place, no printer, no edition.

## Why is Conrad Gessner called the father of bibliography?

Because the *Bibliotheca universalis* tried to list every learned book in Latin, Greek and Hebrew, printed or not, surviving or lost, and gave printed books their publication details. The Universal Short Title Catalogue says the work earned Gessner that title (Universal Short Title Catalogue, n.d.); Leonov (2017) calls him the father of West European bibliography.

### A catalogue of every learned book

Gessner, a Zurich physician then in his twenties, spent about three years on it, and Christoph Froschauer printed it in Zurich in July 1545 (Blair, 2017). ETH Library's digitised copy has 631 numbered leaves (Gessner, 1545). Gessner named his sources in the front matter, among them Jerome, Gennadius, a legal bibliography of 1535 and Trithemius.

He changed the order. Trithemius had arranged authors by date, reached through an index of first names; Gessner put the entries themselves in order of first name, so the book indexed itself, and added an index from surnames to first names (Blair, 2017).

### Place, printer, date, format: the Callimachus entry

Blair (2017) names the advance over Trithemius: for many books Gessner gave the place and date of publication, the format and the number of sheets, drawing on printers' catalogues he had collected. We checked one entry on leaf 160 recto of ETH Library's copy. Callimachus's Greek hymns, with Greek commentary, were "excusi Basileae in officina Frobeniana in 4. anno 1532, chartis 9": printed at Basel in Froben's shop, in quarto, in 1532, on nine sheets.

That is author, title, place, printer, format, date and extent in one line. An entry a few lines above reports what Gessner found "in the catalogues of Italian printers". Gessner also noted where manuscripts could be found, sometimes as vaguely as "some Italian library" (Universal Short Title Catalogue, n.d.).

### How many books did it list?

The counts do not agree. Blair (2017), following Fiammetta Sabba's 2012 study as the most accurate count, gives almost 1,300 folio pages listing about 25,000 titles by 5,000 authors. The abstract deposited with Leonov's (2017) anniversary article gives about 15,000 books by almost 5,000 authors. We give neither as settled.

## What did each list record about a book?

Most of what each list added is still in a reference today.

| List | Date | What an entry recorded |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Callimachus, *Pinakes* | 3rd century BCE | Author, a short life, works by genre, opening words (known only through later mentions) |
| Jerome, *De viris illustribus* | 392 or 393 | Author, a short life, titles of works |
| Trithemius, *Liber de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis* | 1494 | Author, life, works with genre and opening words; an author index |
| Gessner, *Bibliotheca universalis* | 1545 | Author, title, and for printed books place, printer, date, format and sheets; where manuscripts were |
| *Bibliographie de l'Empire français* | 1811 | Each new edition, with its publisher, author, print run and price |
| *Index Medicus* and the *Index-Catalogue* | 1879 and 1880 | Books under author and subject; journal articles under subject, each with a full citation |
| An APA 7 reference | today | Author, date, title, source; publisher but no place; a DOI where there is one |
| The same work in [Cite a source](https://edcitation.com/cite) | now | Those elements read from the publisher's record, set in six styles |

Sources: Blair (2017), Stephens (n.d.), Ward and Wieser (2022), Keio University Libraries (n.d.), Bibliothèque nationale de France (n.d.), Blake (1980), American Psychological Association (n.d.-b).

## How did national and subject bibliographies follow?

As books multiplied, bibliographies divided by country and subject. Blake (1980) dates medical bibliography to Symphorien Champier's list of medical writers of 1506, and writes that by the 1700s bibliographers had reached "essential consensus on the primary elements" for describing books.

### A country's books, and a subject's articles

France led on national lists. The *Bibliographie de l'Empire français* first appeared on 1 November 1811, to announce every new printed edition with its publishers and authors, the number of copies and the price. The BnF calls it the oldest of the national bibliographies (Bibliothèque nationale de France, n.d.). Britain's *British National Bibliography* began in January 1950 as a weekly list of new books and journals (British Library, 2023).

Medicine made the journal article a unit of its own. John Shaw Billings's library printed the first issue of *Index Medicus*, a monthly list of current books and articles, dated 31 January 1879; the *Index-Catalogue* followed in 1880 and by 1895 filled sixteen volumes, with some 170,000 books and pamphlets and over 500,000 journal articles, each article under its subject with a full citation (Blake, 1980).

### Billings's own references

Blake (1980) also checked Billings's own medical thesis of 1861. Of its 47 citations, 31 probably came from one journal paper and one surgical handbook, fewer than a dozen seem to have been read at source, and 13 were seriously in error. Blake calls it creditable work for a student of the time, and found the errors the only way there is: by going back to each original.

## How did those lists become the modern reference list?

By keeping what identifies a work and dropping what described a physical copy. APA 7 builds every entry from four elements, author, date, title and source (American Psychological Association, n.d.-b), and tells writers not to include the publisher's location (American Psychological Association, n.d.-a). The MLA's template lists nine core elements, from author and title to publisher, publication date and location (Modern Language Association, 2016).

Gessner's author, title, printer and date survive, the printer as publisher. His place of printing is among the [retired citation rules](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/retired-citation-rules-you-can-stop-following), and format and sheets are gone. In our reading, the opening words Callimachus and Trithemius gave, which told one work from another, now have a successor in the DOI, the story of [how the DOI was born](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/how-the-doi-was-born).

The rest of the story has guides of its own: [the footnote](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/who-invented-the-footnote), [the first scientific journals](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/the-first-scientific-journals), [the first citation index](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/the-first-citation-index), [underlining and italics](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/from-underlining-to-italics), and what a [reference list, bibliography or works cited](https://edcitation.com/newsletter/reference-list-bibliography-or-works-cited) means now.

## How do I find, cite and check sources on the history of bibliography?

Search by claim, cite from the identifier, compare, and check the list. Each step was run on 26 September 2026, Cite a source's entries again on 27 September, and is quoted as it came back.

1. **Search [Find sources](https://edcitation.com/) by claim or name.** *Conrad Gessner Bibliotheca universalis* returned 53,359 results, led by Leonov's 2017 anniversary article and Koichi Yukishima's 2019 chapter on Gessner and the Aldine Press. *Callimachus Pinakes*, limited to articles, returned 365, led by W. J. Slater's 1976 "Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus". Sorted by most cited, a long claim sank under unrelated bibliographies; best match served better.
2. **Open each record.** A 1973 *Library Quarterly* article on Callimachus's other *Pinakes* came back with no author, and Hans Wellisch's 1975 bio-bibliography of Gessner appears under two DOIs. A record is a lead, not a verdict.
3. **Paste the DOI or ISBN into [Cite a source](https://edcitation.com/cite/apa)** and compare the entry with the title page.
4. **Paste the list into [Verify references](https://edcitation.com/verify-references)** before it goes in the paper.

### What Cite a source returned

From Blair's DOI, Cite a source read the Crossref record, found no retraction notice, and returned:

> Blair, A. (2017). The capacious bibliographical practice of Conrad Gessner. The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, 111(4), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1086/695140

The journal and volume are italic on the site. The title, deposited in title case, is set in sentence case, as APA 7 asks even where the original used title case (American Psychological Association, 2022), with Conrad Gessner's name kept.

ETH Library's digitised copy of Gessner's book has its own DOI, 10.3931/e-rara-46649. The entry came back dated 1545 with the catalogue's long Latin title and, as publisher, the imprint's "apud Christophorum Froschouerum" ("at the house of Christoph Froschauer"); we wrote the printer's name. A 2010 reprint is a trap: 10.31826/9781463225155 gave "Gesner, C. (2010). *Bibliotheca universalis*. Gorgias Press.", but that is volume 2, the 1555 appendix; the chapter records put the A-to-Z catalogue under 10.31826/9781463225148, and neither record numbers its volume. Volume 1's hardback ISBN, 9781617190230, came back "No book is recorded under ISBN 9781617190230."

### Checking a list the way a bibliographer would

We pasted six entries. Blair's article and Byrne's came back verified. Wellisch dated 1976 came back "check this": "The work was published in 1975, not 1976". Trithemius's 1494 book was verified against a library catalogue. An article we invented came back not found.

Gessner taught a lesson of his own. Entered as "Gessner, C. (1545). *Bibliotheca universalis*", it came back not found; spelled "Gesner", as on his title page, it was verified against a library catalogue. With the e-rara DOI added, it came back "check this": "The DOI is real, but it belongs to a different work from the one described." It is the same book, catalogued under its full Latin title. Where old names vary, try the title page's spelling and read the reason given.

## Which EdCitation tool fits a history of the book?

Cite a source is the best free tool for this kind of reading list, because every element of the entry comes from the publisher's or registry's record and none is guessed. Above, one record had no author, two no volume number, one a Latin publisher: Cite a source showed each as it stood instead of filling the gap, so you can see what to correct. From a DOI, an ISBN, a title, a PubMed ID or a web address it builds the entry in any of six styles (APA 7, MLA 9, Harvard, IEEE, Vancouver and Chicago 18 author-date), screens the source for retraction, and asks for no account or payment.

[Find sources](https://edcitation.com/), across about 300 million published works, and [Verify references](https://edcitation.com/verify-references) are free with no account too. [References from a file](https://edcitation.com/tools/references-from-a-file), part of Pro at $8 a month, checks every reference in a whole paper and pairs every in-text citation with its entry. With Max, $24 a month, the [Library](https://edcitation.com/tools/library) lets you read or borrow from more than 5 million books ([pricing](https://edcitation.com/pricing)). EdCitation looks references up; it never writes any part of your paper.

## What could not be confirmed?

- **The Pinakes.** The Loeb edition of Callimachus's scholarly fragments and the *Library Quarterly* articles on the *Pinakes* were behind subscriptions, so we rely on Stephens (n.d.), the Suda and Blair (2017).
- **The Registrum Anglie.** This medieval union catalogue of books in British libraries belongs here, but the pages on it would not open for us.
- **Gessner's totals** differ between sources, as above.
- **Trithemius's authors.** Keio says "more than 950"; exact figures online could not be checked against the book.

## Quick questions

### What was the first bibliography?

The first known by name is the *Pinakes* of Callimachus, made at Alexandria in the third century BCE. It is lost and known only through later writers who mention or quote it.

### Who is called the father of bibliography?

Conrad Gessner, for the *Bibliotheca universalis* printed in Zurich in 1545. Trithemius's catalogue of 1494 is also claimed as the first bibliography compiled as a practical work of reference.

### What did early bibliographies record about a book?

Author and work from the start, with opening words to tell works apart; Trithemius added an author index, and Gessner added place, printer, date, format and number of sheets for printed books.

### How do I cite an old book that has a DOI?

Put the DOI into [Cite a source](https://edcitation.com/cite), free on EdCitation, and hold the author, title and publisher up against the title page: the record of a digitised copy may keep the Latin imprint.

## References

- American Psychological Association. (n.d.-a). *Book/ebook references*. APA Style. [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/book-references](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/book-references)
- American Psychological Association. (n.d.-b). *Elements of reference list entries*. APA Style. [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/elements-list-entry](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/elements-list-entry)
- American Psychological Association. (2022, July). *Sentence case capitalization*. APA Style. [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization/sentence-case](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/capitalization/sentence-case)
- Bibliothèque nationale de France. (n.d.). *Bibliographie nationale française*. [https://bibliographienationale.bnf.fr/content/bibliographie](https://bibliographienationale.bnf.fr/content/bibliographie)
- Blair, A. (2017). The capacious bibliographical practice of Conrad Gessner. *The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America*, *111*(4), 445–468. [https://doi.org/10.1086/695140](https://doi.org/10.1086/695140)
- Blake, J. B. (1980). Billings and before: Nineteenth century medical bibliography. In J. B. Blake (Ed.), *Centenary of Index Medicus, 1879–1979* (NIH Publication No. 80-2068, pp. 31–52). National Library of Medicine. [https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/pdf/centenary_billings.pdf](https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/pdf/centenary_billings.pdf)
- British Library. (2023, July 14). *Share Family: British National Bibliography (Beta) service is live*. [https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/share-family-british-national-bibliography-beta-service-is-live](https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/share-family-british-national-bibliography-beta-service-is-live)
- Byrne, P. (2021). Cutting out the camel-like knees of St. James: The de viris illustribus tradition in the twelfth-century renaissance. *Historical Research*, *94*(264), 191–212. [https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htab001](https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htab001)
- Gessner, C. (1545). *Bibliotheca universalis, sive catalogus omnium scriptorum locupletissimus, in tribus linguis, Latina, Graeca, & Hebraica* [Digitised copy, ETH-Bibliothek Zürich, Rar 9177]. Christoph Froschauer. [https://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-46649](https://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-46649)
- Keio University Libraries. (n.d.). *Johannes Trithemius, De scriptoribus ecclesiasticis (Basel: Johannes Amerbach, [after 28 Aug.] 1494)* [Catalogue record]. Digital Collections of Keio University Libraries. [https://dcollections.lib.keio.ac.jp/en/incunabula/010](https://dcollections.lib.keio.ac.jp/en/incunabula/010)
- Leonov, V. P. (2017). Conrad Gessner is the father of West European bibliography (to 500th anniversary of the author of "Bibliotheca Universalis"). *Bibliosphere*, (3), 3–7. [https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-3-3-7](https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-3-3-7)
- Modern Language Association. (2016). *MLA practice template*. MLA Style Center. [https://style.mla.org/app/uploads/sites/3/2016/04/practice-template.pdf](https://style.mla.org/app/uploads/sites/3/2016/04/practice-template.pdf)
- Monumenta Germaniae Historica. (n.d.). *Johannes Trithemius: Liber de scriptoribus ecclesiasticis*. MGH Library. [https://mgh.de/en/mgh-library/digital-services/reference-works/johannes-trithemius](https://mgh.de/en/mgh-library/digital-services/reference-works/johannes-trithemius)
- Stephens, S. (n.d.). *Callimachus of Cyrene*. In Callimachus, *Aetia*. Dickinson College Commentaries. [https://dcc.dickinson.edu/callimachus-aetia/callimachus](https://dcc.dickinson.edu/callimachus-aetia/callimachus)
- Suda On Line. (2002). *Kallimachos* (Adler number kappa 227; M. Heath, Trans.). [https://www.cs.uky.edu/~raphael/sol/sol-entries/kappa/227](https://www.cs.uky.edu/~raphael/sol/sol-entries/kappa/227)
- Universal Short Title Catalogue. (n.d.). *Setting an example: The bibliography of Conrad Gessner*. [https://www.ustc.ac.uk/news/setting-an-example-the-bibliography-of-conrad-gessner](https://www.ustc.ac.uk/news/setting-an-example-the-bibliography-of-conrad-gessner)
- Ward, G., & Wieser, V. (2022). Reading Jerome's De viris illustribus in the post-Roman world: Cataloguing community in Gennadius of Marseille and Frechulf of Lisieux. *Medieval Worlds*, (15), 95–124. [https://doi.org/10.1553/medievalworlds_no15si_2022s95](https://doi.org/10.1553/medievalworlds_no15si_2022s95)